Re: R.I.P Michael Jackson
man you've got some issues…
The lack of common sense on this board is hard to believe.
the lack of common sense? aren't you the one who can't interprit a simple joke, or a bit of sarcasm? Yeah I thought so.
When you make these statements that imply or outright state that he is a child molester then you are committing Libel. You are defaming him.
by the way…
I didn't make any statements against him, some kid and several court hearings did; and
I didn't defame him, some kid and several court hearings did.
The reason why you will not be held accountable for what you say here is only because nobody gives a shit about your opinion.
doesn't that somewhat prove my point?
You are a nobody.
and then again?
You have anonymity because you hide behind a computer so you throw respect and decency out the window.
LOL if you say so… believe me, there is no hiding behind a computer.
You say whatever you want, not caring if you are hurting or disrespecting others.
Will do! Y'know, you've got some nerve to say that then tell everyone else to F' off. Ya get me?
It is sad really, but in the end you WILL have to answer for what you have done.
I really don't think St. Peter will send me to hell just for disliking Micheal Jackson…
St. Peter: “Okay, one moment, I'm just checking your life history… Oh.. Whats this!? You don't like Micheal Jackson!? TO HELL WITH YOU!!!”
You have to live with yourself.
Generally speaking, yeah, we do…. Wait, you just figured that out!?
When you end up trying to teach your children about treating others with respect you will know how much of a hypocrite you are.
The last thing I'm gonna do when trying to teach my horrific offspring about respect is tell them about how the late Micheal Jackson never quite got any with the children. I'm fairly certain it might scare them.
wow, and that was just your intro… I gotta step it up a bit!
Before you talk about something you should get your facts straight.
Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY! period.
lol, I never said he was :/
A grand jury looked at all the information, heard from all the witnesses and found him NOT GUILTY on all counts.
doesn't mean he didn't do it. like I said, only him or the child in question ONLY knows the truth. and the truth does not always come out in the jury.
IN the CIVIL Lawsuit he settled out of court for 22million. This does not make him guilty you dumb f*ck.
again, never said it did.
A more logical conclusion would be that he paid the boy 22million so that the allegations and media coverage of the case would finally stop.
they're both the same. he pays the boy to stop talking about what he did or did not do together. at the same time, this ends the media frenzy. the logical conclusion is always to rid yourself of more problems at once, rather than one at a time.
You respect the legal system and do all that is asked of you.
so you know what i think now? actually, I think the legal system, though works, is seriously flawed. but you wouldn't know that unless you were either my friend, which your not, or if you had asked me prior to your rediculous rant, which you didn't.
In MJ's case he even allowed the Police to look and take pictures of his private parts to see if they matched up with what the boy said his penis looked like. Could YOU imagine having to do that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No. Nor do i have to, but I wasn't the one accused of molesting a child”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” Why are you comparing me to micheal jackson?
…okay i just checked, and I'm fairly certain that I am not Micheal Jackson! *shock!*
The rest of that paragraph is all 'I love MJ because I love MJ' BS and therefore doesn't deserve a reply.
why do you feel the need to make jokes about him? especially after he is dead? IT IS NOT FUNNY!
…I didn't, silly.
When you wrote that statement that “Respect does not exist anymore and that by the age of 40 you will have only 2 people you should respect” I thought to myself “What a shitty attempt at hijacking the thread. What the hell did that contribute to the thread?
Not only did you misquote me, but i believe, you're the one who started talking about respect saying something along the lines of 'you people should have some f*cking respect!', to which my post was entirely accurate and within the bounds of the conversation. since you came straight out with an insult to everyone here (seriously what did you expect by that?), but you then continue your attempt by lecturing others on respect, which ironically ends up with you gaining no respect at all.
-Like i said, “Respect doesn't exist anymore”.
While both these statements are invalid (wrong) It got me thinking… … When i was young I was taught to respect others.
We were also taught that Santa comes down the chimnea to give up presents on christmas.
have a regard for other peoples’ feelings… Even more importantly, respect means treating one with dignity.
is that what you're doing, then? Should I just copy you and tell everyone to shut F' up. To shout everyone down and constantly reassure everyone that I'm right? …YOU have NO IDEA what respect in it's PURE FORM really is.
This is what many of you are lacking.
My point once again. Respect does not exist.
You have no regard for his feelings, the feelings of his family and loved ones or the feelings of the Millions of his fans.
I 'guarantee' you there are millions of his fans making jokes about his death all around the world, all the while listening to his music.
Furthermore, Why in the world should I!? I never knew him, you never knew him. all you know is his music. do you really think you know HIM just because you like his music? …p**s off!
I wouldn't expect some random person to respect me when im dead. I would hardly expect half my own extended family to!
He was found not guilty in a court of law. You should RESPCT this decision. What other evidence do you have? Do you have proof he molested children? Were you a 'victim'?
so you keep saying.
…and no, I shouldn't respect that decision at all. it's my right to have my own opinion on the matter, and i reserve that to the very end! What evidence do i have? none. What proof? NONE! but i don't need any. by the way, have you asked yourself these questions? because what you just asked me, “were you a 'victim'?”, I asked you, to which you replied rather angrily at.
But once again, this was MY point, not yours. Unless you were the either the child or MJ, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED! AND DESPITE WHAT THE COURT SAID, NEITHER THEY!
Please think about what you are doing. You are making inappropriate jokes about a person who has just DIED!
yes. it is Human Nature to do so as well. for some it helps them pass the reality of it. to deny them the right to do so is to deny them their own feelings. therfore, in 'your' essay's terms is to deny them the respect they deserve to make those jokes. With this, you should at least begin to see why a deeper, more profound respect for, or from someone is earnt, rather than freely given. you hold no value to respect you should give them for doing something that to yourself seems vulgar and immoral, but if you knew that person, got to know them and deeply understood their emotions and feelings, your true respect for would be able to accurately judge them. But right now, you're entire knowledge of respect is based on the prejudice of others.
Innocent until proven Guilty. Enough said.
You forgot something there… Innocent, until proven guilty in a court of law.