Antony19

There are multiplayer DLC and single-player DLC. Multiplayer DLC last longer beacause multiplayer has replay value single-player dont but still there are some DLC that last much longer like Fallout 3 DLC. But this is probably the worst DLC that i haver ever seen

gow2rules said:

Antony19 said:

Yeah Ps3 was the power to do that. But this by a strange way reminds me the style of Fallout 3 where you can build a gun ( railway rifle, rock-it laucher) from thing that you find in every house

---

????????????????????????

wrong topic i'm guessing

Yeah i edit it but you saw it very fast

Yeah Ps3 has the power to do that. But this bu a strange way reminds of Fallout 3 where you can make gun like railway rifle for example from things   that you can find in every house

I loved the knifing one and the Lag. 
Taken from Lag. “Blame it to the server when you get murderd”

Avatar: 7/10 i dont like that cartoon

Signature: 9/10

That DLC sucks i love assassins creed 2 but it doesnt worth

see the review of the ign if you want http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH6swnJt8oU

A question about borderlands do i play online on global or just on the region

The multiplayer on army of two the 40th day is awesome but not so good. The SP was much better. And also there are some games hat put MP on the top instead of the SP ( MW2, Section 8)

And there are some games that they are only stick the multiplayer like MAG.

And also i have to agree with Bigwoodmagazine RTS games only worth on PC.

I have Red alert 3 on the PC and is awesome. But i recenlty download the demo of red alert 3 on PS3 and i didnt like it at all. A big mistake Halo wars imagine that you are playing the game on PC. Strategy games shouls stick to the PC just like command and conquer 4 did