- This topic is empty.
May 7, 2009 at 11:39 pm #24807
xero the great:
russia wouldn’t be a problem, all their stuff is falling apart
now china on the other hand, russia and china Vs britain n america = world war 3. that war would involve nuclear weapons on china n russias part but we would send experimental plagues at them, hmm thinking about it, it would anhialate most of the population on earth, but, U.S n U.K would be the victors of the war, but at what cost?
anyway, avoiding the war cenario. if the west did make an alience it would be for the best. thats my opinion enywayMay 7, 2009 at 11:44 pm #24809
im not sure if it`s as easy as getting out a pen and agreeing to be friends, i`m no expert on this type of thing whatsoever but does anyone else think that if it won`t for the treble and the other ( i can`t remeber the name) alliance WWI may not have been to big. I mean if the uk joined the Us and one got into a war and let`s say the japanese teamed with russia the end results would surely be much worse off than say just one of those countries fighting another…..but i don`t know how this stuff works and i`m not going to pretend i know eitherMay 8, 2009 at 2:35 am #24818shadeblackMember
…there are NO victors in war.May 8, 2009 at 2:45 pm #24836
im going to have to disagree.
we won WW2. we also won WW1.
the veitnamise won in veitnam.
without the set victors to our wars our world would be completely different. for example: if the nazi’s won, we would have alot more tech, and probably alot more richer. there would also be alot less secrets hidden from the public. thered be very little crime. our rulers would care about the public.
but we would be in a constant state of marshal law.
if you deeply think about it, and exclude the “finall solution”, the germans were in the right. hitler was a madman… but he nearly conquered the world.
Fact: britain started world war 2, america ended it.
Fact: in compulsory education you do not learn in depth about the germans other than “the final solution” in history lessons……
were we the good guys?…… or were they?
now im not a nazi or anything, just if your thinking that, i just wonder. the biggest war in history… we won…. yet its not a main topic in history lessons… strange.May 8, 2009 at 4:57 pm #24844
No one won the war…..We stopped Germany but at the cost of how many lives? when you look at it that way there is no winner after all it`s not a gameMay 8, 2009 at 5:11 pm #24847
yeah i know, but we did win nun the less. war may have its casualties but the only way no one can win is if that war wipes out both sides.
take two lions fighting. lion 1 bites lion 2’s leg off but then lion 2 bites lion 1’s throat out.
lion 2 is the victor.
or a way no body wins:
both lions are fighting, lion 2 and lion 1 are evenly matched. they fight non stop for two weeks. fatigue eventually kills both lions.May 8, 2009 at 5:21 pm #24850XeroTheGreatMember
I agree with King, nobody won the war. In WW1, Germany had no choice but to sign the Treaty Of Versailles – all routes into Germany were blockaded and rations were short. Britain did not win the war. I also disagree with your statement about Nazis and how they would rule better. They killed millions of innocent people.
Germany were an extremely powerful country. The Nazis started off with good intentions, but turned out to be mass murderers.May 8, 2009 at 5:34 pm #24853
xero the great:
WW1: how did we not win?
nazi’s: true but it was hitler and his yes men that caused the murders, the others wanted whats best. you ever see the new tom cruise movie, valcyrie? most of the officers and soldiers were decent enough.
i wunder if hitler is censored on the PS chat… hmmmMay 8, 2009 at 5:39 pm #24854
LMAO hitler is censored on the PS chatMay 8, 2009 at 5:42 pm #24857XeroTheGreatMember
Ok. In a battle against Britain and Germany (No allies), I can promise you that Germany would have won. You're forgetting that Britain had allies, who helped. Britain no way won the war single-handed.May 8, 2009 at 6:34 pm #24859iiDiNkStErRMember
did u just say hitler led the 1st world war ???May 8, 2009 at 7:20 pm #24861
xero the great:
um… pretty much what i said “we started the war, america ended it”.
germany had japan and italy. we had U.S, france, russia, italien resistance.
yeah hands down the germans wouldve won, but america joined (because of the japanese and pearl harbour) and ownd the germans.
the nazi’s deserve alot of credit for what they done for the rest of the world. advanced medical science, the jet engine, the first helicopter, laser weapons, space travel, the nuke, anti gravity etc… the list goes on and on.
sure they killed millions… but to save billions. countless lives have been saved due to nazi research.
but the U.K and america stole their tech, researched it abit more (by using ex nazi scientists) then released it to the public all the way through the 1950’s, 60’s, 70’s, 80’s 90’s and their still releasing info now. example: laser weaponry: announced to the public in the 90’s but first researched in 1942. U.S took the credit.May 8, 2009 at 7:23 pm #24862
hitler WAS in WW1. he was a corporal (he had his left testicle shot off he he). but he was in charge of the nazi’s in WW2.May 8, 2009 at 8:01 pm #24865
Correct me if i`m wrong but weren`t the Nazi`s just another name for the Germans whom were with Hitler from the start from the Putsch to WWII but you sound ,like your reffering that all German`s were Nazi`s (which i think isn`t quite right) After all if the Nazi`s reign was 1920`s-1945 and you say they invented laser weapons (which tbh i have never heard of up until now) why not use them in WWII? Also why not use the nukes they supposedly invented before America? I`m sorry for disagreeing with you on this it just seems doubtful………..Oh and please don`t tell me you think Osama Bin Laden has the right idea too…………May 8, 2009 at 8:14 pm #24868Atomic-GMember
hitler WAS in WW1. he was a corporal (he had his left testicle shot off he he). but he was in charge of the nazi’s in WW2.
lol wtf killer i dont know where your heard about hitler getting his testicale shot of but anyway he was in ww1 but n he wasnt a corporal he was a private he was going to be a corporal but he commited war crimes and couldnt also i dont think he did get shot in the balls since he was a messenger n messengers were pretty safe and i think that if he got shot in the left testicale he would have fell to the floor in he pain and then the person that shot him would f finished him off
- The topic ‘Let’s Talk’ is closed to new replies.